Agriculture: California Avocado Commission: California Salmon Council.
Summary
(1) Existing law establishes the California Avocado Commission, which is charged with, among other duties, promoting the sale of avocados by advertising and other promotional means for the purpose of maintaining and expanding present markets and creating new and larger intrastate, interstate, and foreign markets for avocados. Existing law requires the commission to establish 5 districts within the state, each representing approximately 20% of the avocado production in California, and, beginning in the 2000–01 marketing season, requires those districts to be reapportioned every 5th year in accordance with certain procedures. Under existing law, the commission consists of 10 avocado producers who are not handlers, 2 elected from each of the 5 districts, 4 avocado handlers who are elected on a statewide basis, one public member who is appointed by the Secretary of Food and Agriculture, and the secretary who serves as a nonvoting ex officio member. Existing law also provides for an alternate member for each member of the commission, except the secretary, to be elected in the same manner as the member. This bill would instead require the commission to establish no fewer than 3 districts and no more than 5 districts within the state, each representing approximately the same percentage of avocado production in California, and would require those districts to be represented by a specified number of producers who are not handlers according to the number of districts the commission establishes. The bill would require the districts to be reapportioned every 5th year in accordance with redistricting procedures adopted by a two-thirds vote of the commission and concurred in by the secretary. The bill would provide for an alternate member for each district instead of providing an alternate member for each producer member of the commission. The bill would provide for 2 alternate handler members and for each alternate handler member to be assigned to serve as an alternate to two handler members, as specified, instead of providing an alternate handler member for each handler member of the commission. The bill would make conforming and other related changes. (2) Existing law, the California Salmon Marketing and Development Act, creates the California Salmon Council, consisting of 9 voting members, appointed by the Secretary of Food and Agriculture, and 5 nonvoting members, as provided. Under existing law, the council is required to provide advice and investigations for, and perform duties delegated to it by, the secretary, including programs to promote education, research, and public information regarding the consumption of salmon and salmon products. Existing law provides for referendum voting by commercial salmon vessel operators, as defined, to determine whether the act should be implemented and, periodically, to review whether the operation of the act and the council should be continued. Upon approval of the referendum, existing law requires fishermen to pay specified assessments to the secretary and requires the secretary to expend and invest those moneys for purposes of the act. A violation of the act is a misdemeanor. This bill would change the composition of the council to include 3 nonvoting members and would make various changes to the requirements covering commercial salmon fishing, with regard to notification of the adopted regulations by the secretary. The bill would require the secretary to establish a list of handlers, defined to include processors, receivers, and wholesalers, and would provide for referendum voting by those handlers to determine whether they shall be subject to the act. Upon approval of the referendum, the bill would change the composition of the council to include 11 voting members appointed by the secretary. Upon approval of the referendum, the bill would require fishermen who sell salmon to the ultimate consumer and handlers to pay specified assessments to the secretary and would require the secretary to expend and invest those moneys for purposes of the act, thereby making an appropriation. The bill would include handlers, if subject to the act, in the periodic referenda to determine whether the operation of the act and the council should be continued and would make other conforming changes. By authorizing handlers to be subject to the requirements of the act, the violation of which is a misdemeanor, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Aug 2015
Assembly Passage
May 2015
Senate Passage
Aug 2015
Signed into Law
Sep 2015
Introduced Feb 26, 2015
Signed Sep 21, 2015
Floor votes · Senate Aug 20, 2015 · Assembly Aug 24, 2015
How they voted
31–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 33
Aug 20, 2015
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
7
Committee
10
Amendments
3
Sep 21, 2015
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 24, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-0-2)
assembly
Aug 24, 2015
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2559.).
lower
Aug 20, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-2)
senate
Aug 20, 2015
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 22 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 17, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Jul 7, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (July 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 29, 2015
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on AGRI.
upper
Jun 4, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on AGRI.
upper
May 18, 2015
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 14, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 13).
lower
May 5, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 29, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 23, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on AGRI.
lower
Mar 16, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on AGRI.
lower
Feb 27, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 29.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 958
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 958. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline