Health facilities: nursing homes.
Summary
Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of health facilities, as defined. A violation of those provisions is a crime. Existing law requires any person or government entity desiring a license for a health facility, approval for a special service, or approval to manage a health facility currently licensed as a general acute care hospital, acute psychiatric hospital, skilled nursing facility, intermediate care facility, or special hospital, that has not filed an application for a license to operate that facility, to file with the department a verified application containing specific information. This bill would require the denial of an application under those provisions if the applicant fails to provide the requisite information or provide it in the form requested. Existing law requires each applicant for a license to operate a skilled nursing facility or intermediate care facility to make certain disclosures regarding corporate governance and ownership to the State Department of Public Health. Existing law prohibits certain persons, as defined, from governing or owning a beneficial interest of 5% or more of a skilled nursing facility or intermediate care facility, as specified, without approval of the department. This bill would expand those disclosure requirements and the provisions that prohibit certain persons from governing or owning a beneficial interest in a skilled nursing facility or intermediate care facility, as specified. The bill would establish provisions for the denial of an application under circumstances in which a person named in an application has governed or owned a facility that has violated the law during a certain timeframe, as specified, and would require the department to investigate whether an applicant has been subject to professional discipline. Existing law requires the department to implement a consumer information service system regarding long-term care facilities. This bill would revise the information the system is required to contain and would require it to be available on the Internet by March 1, 2017. Because this bill would require additional disclosures, of which a failure to disclose or a false disclosure would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 26, 2015
Last action Feb 1, 2016
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
12
Key actions
4
Committee
7
Jan 12, 2016
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Jan 4, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Apr 14, 2015
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 7, 2015
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 7, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Mar 16, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Feb 27, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 29.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Kevin McCarty
DDemocratic
Co
Cheryl R. Brown
DDemocratic
Co
Freddie Rodriguez
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 927
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 927. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline