Sexual assault crimes.
Summary
Existing law, the Sexual Assault Victims' DNA Bill of Rights, authorizes a law enforcement agency investigating certain felony sex offenses, upon the request of the victim, and subject to the commitment of sufficient resources, to inform the victim whether a DNA profile was obtained from the testing of the rape kit evidence or other crime scene evidence from the case, whether that information has been entered into the Department of Justice Data Bank of case evidence, and whether there is a match between the DNA profile developed from the rape kit evidence or other crime scene evidence and a DNA profile contained in the Department of Justice Convicted Offender DNA Data Base. Existing law also requires that the victim be given written notification by the law enforcement agency if the law enforcement agency elects not to perform DNA testing of the rape kit evidence or other crime scene evidence, or intends to destroy or dispose of the rape kit evidence or other crime scene evidence prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations. Existing law provides that the sole civil or criminal remedy available to a sexual assault victim for a law enforcement agency's failure to fulfill its responsibilities under the Sexual Assault Victims' DNA Bill of Rights is standing to file a writ of mandamus to require compliance with these notification provisions. This bill would require a law enforcement agency responsible for taking or processing rape kit evidence to annually report, by July 1 of each year, to the Department of Justice information pertaining to the processing of rape kits, including the number of rape kits the law enforcement agency collects, the number of those rape kits that are tested, and the number of those rape kits that are not tested. For those rape kits that are not tested, the bill would require the law enforcement agency to also report the reason the rape kit was not tested. By imposing additional duties on local law enforcement agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require, beginning January 1, 2017, and each January 1 after that date, the Department of Justice to submit a report to the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature summarizing the information the department receives pursuant to these provisions. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Aug 2015
Assembly Passage
Jun 2015
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 26, 2015
Last action Aug 27, 2015
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 2, 2015
How they voted
72–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 75
Jun 2, 2015
D
Democratic50
100% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican24
87% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
14
Key actions
4
Committee
9
Aug 27, 2015
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Jul 6, 2015
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 23, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 11, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 2, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (72-0-3)
assembly
May 28, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (May 28).
lower
Apr 29, 2015
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 15, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (April 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 16, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 27, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 29.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 909
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 909. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline