Concurrent enrollment in secondary school and community college.
Summary
(1) Existing law authorizes the governing board of a school district to allow pupils whom the district has determined would benefit from advanced scholastic or vocational work to attend community college as special part-time or full-time students, subject to recommendation by the school principal and parental permission. This bill would authorize the governing board of a school district to authorize a pupil, upon recommendation of the principal of the pupil's school of attendance, and with parental consent, to attend a community college during any session or term as a special part-time or full-time student and to undertake one or more STEM courses, as defined to mean courses in science, technology, engineering, or mathematics, offered at the community college if that pupil has exhausted all opportunities to enroll in an equivalent course at the high school of attendance, or at an adult education program, continuation school, regional occupational center or program, or any other program offered by that school district. The bill also would authorize the governing board of a community college district to enter into a formal partnership with a school district or school districts located within its immediate service area to allow secondary school pupils to attend a community college if those pupils have exhausted all opportunities to enroll in an equivalent STEM course at the high school of attendance, adult education program, continuation school, regional occupational center or program, or any other program offered by that school district. The bill would require the partnership agreement to outline the terms of the partnership, as specified. The bill would require a community college district and a school district, as a condition of, and before adopting, a partnership agreement, to present the adoption of the partnership agreement as an information item at regularly scheduled open meetings of their respective governing boards, and to take testimony from the public and approve or disapprove the proposed partnership agreement at subsequent regularly scheduled open public hearings of their respective governing boards. The bill would require, for each partnership entered into under the bill, the affected community college district and school district to file an annual report, containing specified data, with the Office of the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges, which would transmit this annual report to the Legislature, the Director of Finance, the Superintendent of Public Instruction, and the governing boards of the participating school districts and community college districts, as specified. (2) Existing law requires the governing board of a community college district to assign a low enrollment priority to a pupil attending community college pursuant to a recommendation from his or her principal or school district or a petition from his or her parents, in order to ensure that these pupils, admitted as special part-time or full-time students, do not displace regularly admitted students. This bill would authorize the governing board of a community college district to assign an enrollment priority to pupils attending community college pursuant to a partnership agreement established under the bill. The bill would require community college districts, in assigning an enrollment priority under this provision, to ensure that these pupils do not displace regularly admitted community college students. The bill would prohibit a community college district from receiving an allowance or apportionment for an instructional activity for which a school district has been, or will be, paid. (3) This bill would also make various nonsubstantive changes, and delete obsolete provisions.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 26, 2015
Last action Feb 1, 2016
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
3
Committee
8
Amendments
2
May 28, 2015
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
May 13, 2015
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 4, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 30, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 14, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Apr 13, 2015
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 9, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on ED. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 7).
lower
Mar 25, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
lower
Mar 16, 2015
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HIGHER ED. and ED.
lower
Feb 27, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 29.
lower
1 primary · 21 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ling Ling Chang
RRepublican
Co
Beth Gaines
RRepublican
Co
Catharine B. Baker
RRepublican
Co
Chad Mayes
IIndependent
Co
David Hadley
RRepublican
Co
Donald Wagner
RRepublican
Co
Eric Linder
RRepublican
Co
James Gallagher
RRepublican
Co
Jay Obernolte
RRepublican
Co
Jim Patterson
RRepublican
Co
Katcho Achadjian
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 889
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 889. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline