Collective bargaining: Judicial Council.
Summary
Existing law, the Dills Act, governs collective bargaining between the state and recognized state public employee organizations. Existing law excludes certain employees from coverage under the Dills Act, including, among others, managerial employees, supervisory employees, and confidential employees, as defined. Existing law creates the Public Employment Relations Board and authorizes it, among other things, to determine appropriate state employee bargaining units, as specified. The California Constitution prescribes the membership of the California Supreme Court and requires the Legislature to create appellate court districts, all of which are vested with the judicial power of the state. The California Constitution prescribes the membership and duties of the Judicial Council and authorizes the council to appoint an Administrative Director of the Courts. Existing law creates the Habeas Corpus Resource Center for the purpose of providing representation to people who are convicted and sentenced to death in this state and who are without counsel. This bill would apply the Dills Act to employees of the Judicial Council, subject to specified exceptions. The bill would define an employee for these purposes as any employee of the Judicial Council, except managerial employees, confidential employees, supervisory employees, and excluded employees, as specified. The bill would grant the Judicial Council the sole authority to designate state employee positions as excluded positions and would prohibit exempted managerial, supervisory, confidential, and excluded positions from exceeding 13 of the total authorized Judicial Council positions as stated in the Department of Finance Salaries and Wages Supplement. The bill would prohibit review of the designation of excluded positions by the Public Employment Relations Board. The bill would also except from the definition of employee a judicial officer or employee of the Supreme Court, the courts of appeal, or the Habeas Corpus Resource Center. The bill would define the employer, for purposes of bargaining or meeting and conferring, as the Administrative Director of the Courts, or his or her designated representatives, acting with the authorization of the chairperson of the Judicial Council. The bill would provide that references in the Dills Act to actions or decisions by the Governor, or his or her designated representative, shall mean actions or decisions by the Administrative Director of the Courts. The bill would prohibit the Public Employment Relations Board from including Judicial Council employees in a bargaining unit that includes employees other than those of the Judicial Council.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
Jun 2015
Senate Passage
Aug 2016
Vetoed
Sep 2016
Introduced Feb 26, 2015
Vetoed Sep 30, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Aug 18, 2016 · Assembly Jun 2, 2015
How they voted
23–9
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 34
Aug 18, 2016
D
Democratic24
95% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
6
Committee
14
Amendments
3
Sep 30, 2016
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 24, 2016
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 52. Noes 26. Page 6188.).
lower
Aug 19, 2016
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 21 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 18, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-9-2)
senate
Aug 15, 2016
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Aug 11, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 11).
upper
Aug 1, 2016
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 30, 2016
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 22, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 13, 2016
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 26, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (April 25). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 17, 2016
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
upper
Jun 11, 2015
Committee
Referred to Coms. on P.E. & R. and JUD.
upper
Jun 2, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (49-23-3)
assembly
May 28, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).
lower
May 6, 2015
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 22, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (April 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 6, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P.E., R., & S.S.
lower
Mar 26, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on P.E., R., & S.S.
lower
Feb 27, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 29.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 874
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 874. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline