Sex crimes: professional services.
Summary
Under existing law, a person is guilty of sexual battery, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail or in the state prison for 2, 3, or 4 years, if he or she touches an intimate part of another person for the purpose of sexual arousal, sexual gratification, or sexual abuse, while the victim is unconscious of the nature of the act because the perpetrator fraudulently represented that the touching served a professional purpose. Existing law makes the crime punishable by 2, 3, or 4 years in the state prison if committed against a minor by a person with a prior conviction for sexual battery. This bill would expand the crime of sexual battery to apply to a person who performs professional services that entail having access to another person's body, who touches an intimate part of the that person's body while performing those services and the touching was against the person's will and for the purpose of sexual arousal, sexual gratification, or sexual abuse. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law defines rape as an act of sexual intercourse accomplished with a person not the spouse of the perpetrator under any of several circumstances. Existing law also defines the crimes of sodomy, oral copulation, and sexual penetration. This bill would expand the definitions of each of those crimes to include when any of those acts are performed against a victim's will by a professional whose services entail having access to the victim's body, if the conduct is performed by the professional while performing those services. By expanding the scope of these crimes, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Aug 2015
Assembly Passage
Apr 2015
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 26, 2015
Last action Aug 27, 2015
Floor votes · Assembly Apr 23, 2015
How they voted
71–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 72
Apr 23, 2015
D
Democratic47
97% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican24
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
16
Key actions
4
Committee
10
Aug 27, 2015
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Jun 29, 2015
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 16, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 16). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 2, 2015
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 7, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Apr 23, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (71-0-1)
assembly
Apr 15, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 15).
lower
Apr 8, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 26, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 16, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 27, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 29.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Tom Daly
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 860
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 860. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline