Electrical and gas corporations: security of plant and facilities.
Summary
Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations and gas corporations, as defined. If the commission finds after a hearing that the rules, practices, equipment, appliances, facilities, or service of any public utility, or of the methods of manufacture, distribution, transmission, storage, or supply employed by the public utility, are unjust, unreasonable, unsafe, improper, inadequate, or insufficient, the Public Utilities Act requires that the commission determine and, by order or rule, fix the rules, practices, equipment, appliances, facilities, service, or methods to be observed, furnished, constructed, enforced, or employed. The Public Utilities Act requires the commission to prescribe rules for the performance of any service or the furnishing of any commodity of the character furnished or supplied by any public utility and, on proper demand and tender of rates, require the public utility to furnish the commodity or render the service within the time and upon the conditions provided in the rules adopted by the commission. This bill would, on and after the filing of an electrical corporation's or gas corporation's general rate case application, require that electrical corporation or gas corporation, except as provided, to utilize employees of that corporation for any work associated with the design, engineering, and operation of its nuclear, electrical, and gas infrastructure, including all computer and information technology systems, unless the utility files a request to contract to utilize persons who will replace those employees with the commission as a part of the utility's general rate case application. The bill would require that the request be a separate stand-alone section that is not embedded in the general requested staffing change proposals. The bill would require the utility to demonstrate that the work can be performed safely and securely, and without jeopardizing the security of its nuclear, electrical, and gas infrastructure. The bill would require the commission to evaluate the utility's proposal. The bill would require the commission to issue a written decision to approve or deny the request as part of the general rate case proceeding. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because the provisions of this bill would be a part of the act and because a violation of an order or decision of the commission implementing its requirements would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Aug 2015
Assembly Passage
Jun 2015
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 26, 2015
Last action Sep 11, 2015
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 2, 2015
How they voted
44–24
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 72
Jun 2, 2015
D
Democratic47
93% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Nay
R
Republican24
91% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
7
Committee
11
Amendments
5
Sep 1, 2015
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Aug 31, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 4. Noes 3.) (August 27).
upper
Aug 24, 2015
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Aug 18, 2015
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 17, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (July 13).
upper
Jun 29, 2015
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 18, 2015
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 11, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
Jun 2, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (44-24-4)
assembly
May 28, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).
lower
May 13, 2015
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 4, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 30, 2015
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 29, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 4.) (April 27).
lower
Mar 25, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Mar 16, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Feb 27, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 29.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
RH
Roger Hernández
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 853
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 853. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline