Sacramento Regional Transit District.
Summary
Existing law provides for the creation of the Sacramento Regional Transit District, with specified powers and duties relative to the provision of public transit services. Existing law describes the authorized boundaries of the district, as specified, and provides that the boundaries of the district, at any point in time, shall consist of the area of any city or county within the authorized boundaries where the governing board of the city or county has declared a need for the district to operate. Existing law authorizes the district to operate in any city or county where the need for the district to operate has been declared, except that the district has no power to levy an ad valorem property tax unless a city or county adopts a specified resolution. Existing law provides for a city or county to annex to the district through a written request to the district and approval by the Sacramento Area Council of Governments. This bill would revise and recast these provisions. The bill would provide that the boundaries of the district, at any point in time, shall consist of specified areas, including a city or county that has acted to annex to the district, and a city incorporated on or after January 1, 2016, if the newly incorporated city consists of territory that was included in the district prior to incorporation. The bill would require an annexation to be subject to an agreement between the annexing city or county and the district board specifying the terms and conditions of annexation, and would delete the requirement for approval of annexation by the Sacramento Area Council of Governments. The bill would provide procedures for detachment of territory within the district by a specified supermajority vote of the district board and a majority vote of the governing body of the territory proposed to be detached.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Aug 2015
Assembly Passage
May 2015
Senate Passage
Aug 2015
Signed into Law
Sep 2015
Introduced Feb 25, 2015
Signed Sep 28, 2015
Floor votes · Senate Aug 24, 2015 · Assembly May 22, 2015
How they voted
33–0
Passed
Total votes 33
Aug 24, 2015
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
7
Committee
5
Amendments
5
Sep 28, 2015
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 27, 2015
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2612.).
lower
Aug 25, 2015
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 27 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 24, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0)
senate
Jul 16, 2015
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Jul 15, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (July 14).
upper
Jun 4, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
May 22, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-0-5)
assembly
May 11, 2015
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 7, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (May 6).
lower
Apr 7, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Mar 12, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 26, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 28.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Beth Gaines
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 738
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 738. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline