Juveniles: sealing of records.
Summary
Existing law subjects a person under 18 years of age who commits a crime to the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, which may adjudge that person to be a ward of the court, except as specified. Under existing law, juvenile court proceedings to declare a minor a ward of the court are commenced by the filing of a petition by the probation officer, the district attorney after consultation with the probation officer, or the prosecuting attorney, as specified. Existing law requires the juvenile court to order the petition of a minor who is subject to the jurisdiction of the court dismissed if the minor satisfactorily completes a term of probation or an informal program of supervision, as specified, and requires the court to seal all records in the custody of the juvenile court pertaining to that dismissed petition, except as specified. This bill would provide that these provisions do not apply if the petition was sustained based on the commission of certain offenses committed when the individual was 14 years of age or older. The bill would require records pertaining to those cases in the custody of law enforcement agencies, the probation department, or the Department of Justice to be sealed according to a certain procedure. The bill would authorize an individual who has a record that is eligible to be sealed to ask the court to order the sealing of a record pertaining to the case that is in the custody of a public agency other than a law enforcement agency, the probation department, or the Department of Justice. The bill would make records sealed pursuant to this provision available for access or inspection only under specified circumstances. The bill would make related changes. The bill would also require the Judicial Council to adopt rules of court, and make available appropriate forms, providing for the standardized implementation of these provisions by the juvenile courts. By imposing new duties on local agencies relating to sealing juvenile records, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law authorizes a person who is the subject of a juvenile court record, or the county probation officer, to petition the court for the sealing of the records relating to the person's case, including records in the custody of the juvenile court, the probation officer, or any other agencies, including law enforcement agencies and public officials as the petitioner alleges to have custody of the records. Existing law provides that records sealed pursuant to this provision are not open to inspection, except as specified. This bill would additionally make those records open to inspection to comply with data collection or data reporting requirements imposed by other provisions of law and would authorize a court to give a researcher or research organization access to information contained in those records, as specified. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. This bill would incorporate changes to Section 786 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by both this bill and AB 989, which would become operative only if both bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2016, and this bill is chaptered last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Sep 2015
Assembly Passage
Jun 2015
Senate Passage
Sep 2015
Signed into Law
Sep 2015
Introduced Feb 24, 2015
Signed Sep 30, 2015
Floor votes · Senate Sep 11, 2015 · Assembly Jun 2, 2015
How they voted
22–13
Passed
Total votes 35
Sep 11, 2015
D
Democratic24
91% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
10
Committee
11
Amendments
6
Sep 30, 2015
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 11, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (22-13)
senate
Sep 11, 2015
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 42. Noes 34. Page 3146.).
lower
Sep 10, 2015
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 2, 2015
Upper · Passed
Measure version as amended on August 31 corrected.
upper
Sep 1, 2015
Upper · Passed
Measure version as amended on August 31 corrected.
upper
Aug 31, 2015
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Aug 27, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 27).
upper
Aug 17, 2015
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 15, 2015
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 14, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (July 7).
upper
Jun 23, 2015
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Testimony taken.
upper
Jun 11, 2015
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 11, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 2, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (40-30-5)
assembly
Apr 29, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (April 29).
lower
Apr 15, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 13, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 9, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 25, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mark Stone
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 666
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 666. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline