Peace officers: body-worn cameras.
Summary
Existing law makes it a crime to intentionally record a confidential communication without the consent of all parties to the communication. Existing law exempts specified peace officers from that provision if they are acting within the scope of their authority. This bill would impose specified requirements on a law enforcement agency that requires a peace officer employed by the agency to use a body-worn camera, including, among other things, a requirement that the agency conspicuously post its policies and procedures regarding body-worn cameras on its Internet Web site. The bill would prohibit a peace officer employed by a law enforcement agency that requires a body-worn camera to be used by its peace officers from, among other things, making copies of any body-worn camera files for his or her personal use, or using a recording device such as a telephone camera or secondary video camera to record a body-worn camera file or image. Except as provided, the bill would authorize a peace officer subject to its provisions to review his or her body-worn camera video before making his or her initial statement and report. This bill would specifically authorize a law enforcement agency that requires a body-worn camera to be used by a peace officer that the agency employs to consider specified model policies when adopting a body-worn camera policy, including, among others, a policy regarding where a peace officer is authorized to position the body-worn camera to facilitate optimum recording field of view. Existing law, the California Public Records Act, requires state and local agencies to make their records available for public inspection, unless an exemption from disclosure applies. This bill would exempt specified body-worn camera files created by a peace officer of a state or local law enforcement agency from disclosure pursuant to the act, including, among others, files that depict any victim of rape, incest, domestic violence, or child abuse, if the footage relates to any of those incidents. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires local agencies, for the purpose of ensuring public access to the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies, to comply with a statutory enactment that amends or enacts laws relating to public records or open meetings and contains findings demonstrating that the enactment furthers the constitutional requirements relating to this purpose. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2014
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Dec 17, 2014
Last action Feb 1, 2016
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
3
Committee
7
Amendments
4
May 7, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 6, 2015
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
May 5, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 30).
lower
Apr 28, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.
lower
Apr 21, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.
lower
Apr 20, 2015
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 16, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (April 14).
lower
Apr 13, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Apr 6, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 26, 2015
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and P. & C.P.
lower
Dec 18, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee January 17.
lower
Dec 17, 2014
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Shirley N. Weber
DDemocratic
Co
Freddie Rodriguez
DDemocratic
Co
Mike Gipson
DDemocratic
Co
Rob Bonta
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 66
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 66. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline