Abuse-deterrent opioid analgesic drug products.
Summary
Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of that act a crime. Existing law also provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. These provisions require specified services and drugs to be covered by the various plans. This bill would, where an abuse-deterrent opioid analgesic drug product, as defined, is available, prohibit a health care service plan or insurer from requiring the use of opioid analgesic drug products without the abuse-deterrent properties in order to access abuse-deterrent opioid analgesic drug products. The bill would require a health care service plan or insurer to allow a provider to prescribe, and if otherwise covered, to provide coverage for, a less than 30-day supply of an opioid analgesic drug product. Because a willful violation of these requirements with respect to health care service plans would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law, the Pharmacy Law, the knowing violation of which is a crime, provides for the licensing and regulation of pharmacists by the California State Board of Pharmacy. Existing regulations require a pharmacist to provide oral consultation to his or her patient or the patient's agent in all care settings upon request or whenever the pharmacist deems it warranted. This bill would require a pharmacist to inform a patient receiving an opioid analgesic drug product on proper storage and disposal of the drug, and would require the board to adopt regulations to implement that provision. Because a violation of this requirement would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 24, 2015
Last action Feb 1, 2016
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
14
Key actions
3
Committee
7
Amendments
2
May 28, 2015
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
May 27, 2015
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 5, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 4, 2015
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 30, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 1.) (April 28).
lower
Apr 23, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on B. & P. (Ayes 15. Noes 4.) (April 21). Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.
lower
Apr 6, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Mar 26, 2015
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and B. & P.
lower
Feb 25, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 623
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 623. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline