Dealer charges: license plates.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the Department of Motor Vehicles to establish contracts for electronic programs that allow qualified private industry partners to join the department in providing services that include processing and payment programs for vehicle registration and titling transactions. Under existing law, a dealer is authorized to charge the purchaser or lessee of a vehicle certain charges, including an electronic filing charge, not to exceed the actual amount the dealer is charged by a first-line service provider, for providing license plate processing, postage, and other specified fees and services relating to first-line service providers. This bill would prohibit the electronic filing charge from being used to pay for additional fees, goods, or services not directly related to the electronic registration of a motor vehicle. Because a violation of these provisions would constitute an infraction, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Sep 2015
Assembly Passage
May 2015
Senate Passage
Sep 2015
Signed into Law
Oct 2015
Introduced Feb 24, 2015
Signed Oct 9, 2015
Floor votes · Senate Sep 8, 2015 · Assembly May 14, 2015
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Sep 8, 2015
D
Democratic24
95% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
8
Committee
11
Amendments
1
Oct 9, 2015
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 9, 2015
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 3015.).
lower
Sep 8, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-2)
senate
Sep 8, 2015
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 10 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jul 6, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (July 6).
upper
Jun 24, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 16, 2015
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
May 28, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
May 14, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (75-0)
assembly
May 6, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 6).
lower
Apr 28, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 20, 2015
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 6, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Mar 26, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Feb 25, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mike Gatto
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 605
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 605. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline