State highways: excess property.
Summary
Existing law provides that the Department of Transportation has full possession and control of state highways and associated property. Existing law governs the disposal of excess property not needed for highway purposes upon terms, standards, and conditions established by the California Transportation Commission. This bill, notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of adding certain rental housing units to a proposed residential development project adjacent to a maintenance facility of the department, if a portion of the department's property is immediately contiguous to the development project and is not independently developable, would encourage the department to find that portion of the property to be excess and to sell that portion of the property at fair market value to the owner of the contiguous property, at the owner's request, under certain conditions. The bill would require the determination of fair market value to be determined by an appraiser jointly agreed upon by the department and the contiguous property owner, based on the property's highest and best use. The bill would specify the obligations of the purchaser of the property with respect to the type and amount of residential rental units to be constructed on the acquired property and consistency of the construction with the general plan of the jurisdiction in which the property is located. The bill would require the purchaser of the property to agree to pay for the reconstruction of any existing buildings located on the property being acquired from the department, with the cost of construction to be deducted from the fair market value of the property being acquired. The bill would require the commission to certify compliance with all of the conditions imposed by the bill before the sale of property is finalized. The bill would require the department and the commission to complete any transaction authorized by the bill by January 1, 2020.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Jun 2016
Assembly Passage
Apr 2015
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 24, 2015
Last action Jun 27, 2016
Floor votes · Assembly Apr 30, 2015
How they voted
69–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 72
Apr 30, 2015
D
Democratic47
95% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican24
95% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
13
Key actions
5
Committee
8
Jun 27, 2016
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 21, 2016
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
May 21, 2015
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 14, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
Apr 30, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-3)
assembly
Apr 22, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 22).
lower
Apr 7, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (April 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 9, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & P.
lower
Feb 25, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Phil Ting
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 576
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 576. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline