Alcoholic beverage control: tied-house restrictions: advertising.
Summary
Existing law generally restricts certain alcoholic beverage licensees, including manufacturers and winegrowers, from paying, crediting, or compensating a retailer for advertising in connection with the advertising and sale of alcoholic beverages. Existing law expressly authorizes a beer manufacturer, holder of a winegrower's license, winegrower's agent, holder of an importer's general license, distilled spirits manufacturer, holder of a distilled spirits rectifier's general license, or a distilled spirits manufacturer's agent to sponsor events promoted by or purchase advertising space and time from, or on behalf of, a live entertainment marketing company that is a wholly owned subsidiary of a live entertainment company that has its principal place of business in the County of Los Angeles, as provided. This bill would expressly authorize, until January 1, 2019, a beer manufacturer, as described, holder of a winegrower's license, winegrower's agent, holder of any importer's license that does not also hold a wholesaler or retail license as an additional license, as specified, distilled spirits manufacturer, holder of any rectifier's license, or a distilled spirits manufacturer's agent to sponsor events promoted by or purchase advertising space and time from, or on behalf of, a live entertainment marketing company that is a wholly owned subsidiary of a live entertainment company that is not publicly traded and has its principal place of business in the County of Napa, under specified conditions. The bill would also make a beer manufacturer, holder of a winegrower's license, winegrower's agent, holder of any importer's license, distilled spirits manufacturer, holder of any rectifier's license, or a distilled spirits manufacturer's agent who, through coercion or other illegal means, induces the holder of a wholesaler's license to fulfill those contractual obligations entered into pursuant to these provisions guilty of a misdemeanor. The bill would additionally make an on-sale retail licensee, as described, who solicits or coerces a holder of a wholesaler's license to solicit a beer manufacturer, holder of a winegrower's license, winegrower's agent, holder of any importer's license, distilled spirits manufacturer, holder of any rectifier's license, or a distilled spirits manufacturer's agent to purchase advertising time or space pursuant to these provisions guilty of a misdemeanor. By creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the County of Napa. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Sep 2015
Assembly Passage
May 2015
Senate Passage
Sep 2015
Signed into Law
Oct 2015
Introduced Feb 23, 2015
Signed Oct 6, 2015
Floor votes · Senate Sep 11, 2015 · Assembly Sep 11, 2015
How they voted
35–0
Passed
Total votes 35
Sep 11, 2015
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
8
Committee
9
Amendments
3
Oct 6, 2015
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 11, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (73-0-2)
assembly
Sep 11, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0)
senate
Sep 11, 2015
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 3141.).
lower
Sep 10, 2015
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 17, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 29, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 4, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
May 20, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 20).
lower
May 5, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 30, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 29, 2015
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 28, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 20. Noes 0.) (April 22).
lower
Mar 5, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
Feb 24, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bill Dodd
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 527
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 527. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline