Wireless 911 calls: emergency telephone user surcharge.
Summary
Existing law establishes the Public Safety Communications Division within the Office of Emergency Services, under the supervision of a chief, to carry out specific duties relating to state needs and plans for public safety communications systems and equipment. This bill would require the division to require its California 911 Emergency Communications Branch to work with the Department of the California Highway Patrol to continue the work of the Routing on Empirical Data (RED) Project by using the technology and procedures employed in that project to assist in determining whether wireless 911 calls should be routed to a local public safety answering point or a California Highway Patrol call center. The bill would require that the project use historical empirical call data to determine the most efficient routing for wireless 911 calls. The Emergency Telephone Users Surcharge Act generally imposes a surcharge on amounts paid by every person in the state for intrastate telephone service to provide revenues sufficient to fund "911" emergency telephone system costs, and requires the Office of Emergency Services to annually determine the surcharge rate, subject to a specified formula, that it estimates will produce sufficient revenue to fund the current fiscal year's 911 costs, as specified. This bill would instead impose the surcharge at a flat monthly rate of between $0.15 and $0.75, determined annually by the office. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
May 2016
Assembly Passage
Jun 2015
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 23, 2015
Last action May 31, 2016
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 1, 2015
How they voted
72–0
Passed
Total votes 72
Jun 1, 2015
D
Democratic47
100% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican24
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
16
Key actions
6
Committee
11
May 31, 2016
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jul 15, 2015
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
Jul 2, 2015
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 25, 2015
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 22, 2015
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
Jun 11, 2015
Committee
Referred to Coms. on E., U., & C. and G.O.
upper
Jun 1, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (72-0)
assembly
May 28, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 28).
lower
May 20, 2015
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 9, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 21. Noes 0.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 5, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
Feb 24, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 510
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 510. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline