Contracts against public policy.
Summary
Existing law declares that negotiation of terms and conditions of labor should result from voluntary agreement between employer and employee. Existing law provides that any person who coerces or compels any other person to enter into an agreement, written or verbal, not to join or become a member of any labor organization, as a condition of securing employment or continuing in employment, is guilty of a misdemeanor. This bill would prohibit any person from requiring another person, as a condition of employment, to agree to the waiver of any legal right, penalty, forum, or procedure for any employment law violations. The bill would prohibit a person from threatening, retaliating against, or discriminating against another person based on a refusal to agree to such waiver, and would provide that any such waiver required from an employee or potential employee as a condition of employment or continued employment is unconscionable, against public policy, and unenforceable. The bill would require that any waiver of a person's employment rights, not prohibited by state or federal law, be knowing and voluntary and in writing, and expressly not made as a condition of employment. The bill would provide that a person seeking to enforce a waiver has the burden of proof to show that the waiver was knowing and voluntary. The bill would apply to any waiver agreement entered into on or after January 1, 2016, and would authorize an award of reasonable attorney's fees to the prevailing claimant. The bill would except specified self-regulatory organizations and specified employees from the application of its provisions. The bill would provide that its provisions are severable.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Aug 2015
Assembly Passage
May 2015
Senate Passage
Aug 2015
Vetoed
Apr 2016
Introduced Feb 23, 2015
Vetoed Apr 21, 2016
Floor votes · Assembly May 14, 2015
How they voted
41–27
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 72
May 14, 2015
D
Democratic47
87% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Nay
R
Republican24
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
5
Committee
9
Amendments
1
Apr 21, 2016
Vetoed
Last day to consider Governor's veto pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5.
lower
Oct 11, 2015
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 27, 2015
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 46. Noes 31. Page 2611.).
lower
Aug 25, 2015
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 27 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 24, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 23).
upper
Jun 10, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 10). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 28, 2015
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. & I.R. and JUD.
upper
May 14, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (41-27-4)
assembly
May 7, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (May 6).
lower
May 4, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Apr 6, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Mar 26, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Feb 24, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
RH
Roger Hernández
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 465
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 465. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline