Oil and gas: groundwater monitoring.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires the State Oil and Gas Supervisor to supervise the drilling, operation, maintenance, and abandonment of wells and the operation, maintenance, and removal or abandonment of tanks and facilities attendant to oil and gas production. Existing law authorizes the supervisor to require a well operator to implement a monitoring program, designed to detect releases to the soil and water, for aboveground oil production tanks and facilities. Under existing law, a person who fails to comply with specified requirements relating to the regulation of oil or gas operation is guilty of a misdemeanor. This bill would additionally authorize the supervisor to require a well operator to implement a monitoring program for belowground oil production tanks and facilities, and disposal and injection wells. Because a failure to comply with this requirement would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The federal Safe Drinking Water Act regulates certain wells as Class II wells. Under existing federal law, the authority to regulate Class II wells in California is delegated to the Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources. Under existing regulations, a well operator is required to obtain approval from the supervisor or a district deputy for a subsurface injection or disposal project, including Class II wells, or any change in a project, as provided. This bill would require the division to annually review underground injection or disposal projects approved by the division that use Class II wells. The bill would require the operator of the project, as a part of its application or the annual review process, to submit to the State Water Resources Control Board or appropriate regional water quality control board for its review and concurrence a groundwater monitoring plan containing certain information, including, among other things, a schedule for monitoring and reporting groundwater quality data, as provided. The bill would authorize the state board or appropriate regional water quality control board to periodically require the modification of the plan to reflect changing conditions. The bill would require the data be submitted to the state board in an electronic format compatible with the state board's geotracker database. Because a violation of this requirement would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) Existing federal law prohibits certain well activities that affect underground sources of drinking water unless those sources are located in an exempted aquifer. Existing federal law authorizes a state delegated with the responsibility of regulating Class II wells to propose that an aquifer or a portion of an aquifer be an exempted aquifer and authorizes the United States Environmental Protection Agency to approve the proposal if the aquifer or a portion of the aquifer meets certain criteria. This bill would require the division, prior to proposing to the United States Environmental Protection Agency an aquifer for exemption, to hold a public hearing on the proposal and to submit the proposal to the state board for review and written concurrence. The bill would authorize the state board to concur with the proposal if certain conditions are met. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
died
2 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
May 2015
Assembly Failed
Jun 2015
Governor
Introduced Feb 17, 2015
Last action Feb 1, 2016
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 4, 2015
How they voted
27–32
Failed · 16 other
Total votes 75
Jun 4, 2015
D
Democratic50
54% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Nay
R
Republican24
91% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
3
Committee
5
Amendments
4
Jun 4, 2015
Vote failed
Assembly Vote: fail (27-32-16)
assembly
Jun 1, 2015
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 28, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 6.) (May 28).
lower
May 20, 2015
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 6, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 5, 2015
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
May 4, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (April 27).
lower
Mar 18, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Mar 2, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Feb 18, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
DW
Das Williams
DDemocratic
Co
Adrin Nazarian
DDemocratic
Co
Mark Stone
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 356
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 356. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline