Lost money and goods: bicycles: restoration to owner.
Summary
Existing law requires a person who finds and takes possession of property that is lost to try and return it to the rightful owner. If the owner of the lost property cannot be determined and the item is worth $100 or more, the finder is required to turn the item over to the police or sheriff, as specified. Existing law provides 90 days for the owner to return and claim the property and to pay any reasonable fee for its bailment. Existing law requires, if the reported value of the property is $250 or more and the owner does not return and claim the property, the police or the sheriff to cause notice of the property to be published, as provided. This bill, until December 31, 2020, would provide that if that lost property is found on a vehicle of public conveyance or on public transit property, that it instead be turned in to the public transit agency, and would provide 90 days for the owner to return and claim the property, as specified. The bill, until December 31, 2020, also would require the public transit agency to cause notice of the property to be published under the circumstances described above. The bill, until January 1, 2021, would authorize a transit agency to utilize alternate unclaimed property procedures with respect to lost or unclaimed bicycles turned in to or held by that public transit agency. Because this bill would impose new requirements on local transportation agencies, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Jul 2015
Assembly Passage
May 2015
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 13, 2015
Last action Jul 6, 2015
Floor votes · Assembly May 11, 2015
How they voted
67–2
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 72
May 11, 2015
D
Democratic47
97% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican24
83% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
8
Committee
11
Amendments
2
Jul 6, 2015
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 17, 2015
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 11, 2015
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 9, 2015
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 21, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 11, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-2-3)
assembly
Apr 29, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 29).
lower
Apr 15, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 14, 2015
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 13, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 7).
lower
Mar 18, 2015
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 12, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 23, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 17, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 318
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 318. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline