Pupil nutrition: free or reduced-price meals: adequate time to eat.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires each school district or county superintendent of schools maintaining kindergarten or any of grades 1 to 12, inclusive, to provide one nutritionally adequate free or reduced-price meal for each needy pupil during each schoolday, except as specified. Existing law authorizes a school district or county office of education to use funds made available through any applicable federal or state program or to use its own funds to provide the required meals. This bill would express legislative intent that schools provide pupils with adequate time to eat lunch during the schoolday. The bill would require school districts, in addition to providing a nutritionally adequate free or reduced-price meal for each needy pupil each schoolday, to ensure that each of the schools in their respective jurisdictions makes available to its pupils adequate time to eat after being served lunch. The bill would declare that the State Department of Education specifies that an adequate time to eat school lunch is 20 minutes after being served. The bill would require a school that determines, upon annual review of its bell schedule, that it is currently not providing pupils with adequate time to eat, to identify and develop a plan to implement, in consultation with the school district, ways to increase pupils' time to eat lunch. To the extent this requirement would create new duties for schools and school districts, it would constitute a state-mandated local program. The bill would specify that, in order to comply with its requirements requiring adequate time for pupils to eat after being served, the appropriate school food authority may use available federally or state-regulated nonprofit school food service cafeteria accounts to defray any costs allowable under federal and state law. The bill would also make nonsubstantive changes to these provisions. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Aug 2015
Assembly Passage
Jun 2015
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 11, 2015
Last action Aug 27, 2015
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 4, 2015
How they voted
48–23
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 72
Jun 4, 2015
D
Democratic47
97% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Nay
R
Republican24
91% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
5
Committee
9
Amendments
4
Aug 27, 2015
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 17, 2015
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 8, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (July 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 18, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Jun 4, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (48-23-1)
assembly
Jun 2, 2015
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
Jun 1, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (May 28).
lower
Apr 15, 2015
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.
lower
Apr 8, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 7, 2015
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 6, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (March 25).
lower
Mar 19, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 23, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 12, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 14.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Miguel Santiago
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 292
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 292. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline