Minimum wage violations: challenges.
Summary
Under existing law, any employer or other person acting either individually or as an officer, agent, or employee of another person, who pays or causes to be paid to any employee a wage less than the minimum fixed by applicable state or local law or an order of the Industrial Welfare Commission, is subject to a civil penalty, restitution of wages, liquidated damages payable to the employee, and any applicable specified penalties, as provided. Existing law provides notice and hearing requirements under which a person against whom a citation has been issued can request a hearing to contest proposed assessment of a civil penalty, wages, liquidated damages, and any applicable penalties. Existing law further provides that after a hearing with the Labor Commissioner, a person contesting a citation may file a writ of mandate, within 45 days, with the appropriate superior court. This bill would require a person seeking a writ of mandate contesting the Labor Commissioner's ruling to post a bond with the Labor Commissioner, as specified, in an amount equal to the unpaid wages assessed under the citation, excluding penalties. The bill would require that the bond be issued in favor of the unpaid employees and ensure that the person seeking the writ makes prescribed payments pursuant to the proceedings. The bill would provide that the proceeds of the bond, sufficient to cover the amount owed, would be forfeited to the employee if the employer fails to pay the amounts owed within 10 days from the conclusion of the proceedings, as specified.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
May 2016
Senate Passage
Aug 2016
Signed into Law
Sep 2016
Introduced Mar 1, 2016
Signed Sep 25, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Aug 24, 2016 · Assembly May 23, 2016
How they voted
22–9
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 33
Aug 24, 2016
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
8
Committee
12
Sep 25, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 30, 2016
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Aug 24, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (22-9-2)
senate
Aug 1, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 29, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 9, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
upper
May 23, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (46-22-3)
assembly
May 18, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 6.) (May 18).
lower
May 11, 2016
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
May 5, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 21, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 20). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 14, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Mar 30, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Mar 28, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Mar 2, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee April 1.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
RH
Roger Hernández
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2899
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2899. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline