Teachers: evaluation and assessment.
Summary
Existing law requires the State Board of Education to develop guidelines that school districts may use in the development of certain teacher evaluation procedures and to distribute those guidelines to every school district. Existing law states the intent of the Legislature that governing boards of school districts establish a uniform system of evaluation and assessment of the performance of all certificated personnel within each school district of the state. Existing law requires the governing board of each school district to establish standards of expected pupil achievement at each grade level in each area of study and to evaluate and assess certificated employee performance on a continuing basis as it reasonably relates to specified matters, including the progress of pupils, as provided, instructional techniques and strategies, and adherence to curricular objectives. Existing law authorizes the governing board of a school district to develop and adopt additional evaluation and assessment guidelines or criteria. This bill would specifically authorize and encourage the evaluation and assessment of certificated employee performance as it reasonably relates to the progress of pupils, instructional techniques and strategies, and adherence to curricular objectives to include certain things, as provided. The bill would also provide that it shall not be construed to require the state board to revise its guidelines, to limit a school district governing board's authority to adopt additional guidelines or criteria, or to limit the right of certificated employees or their exclusive representative to bargain concerning evaluation procedures.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
May 2016
Senate Passage
Aug 2016
Vetoed
Sep 2016
Introduced Feb 19, 2016
Vetoed Sep 30, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Aug 11, 2016 · Assembly May 27, 2016
How they voted
31–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 33
Aug 11, 2016
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
7
Committee
9
Amendments
3
Sep 30, 2016
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 18, 2016
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 5872.).
lower
Aug 11, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-2)
senate
Aug 11, 2016
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 14 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 29, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 29).
upper
Jun 14, 2016
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Jun 9, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
May 27, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (59-0-12)
assembly
May 11, 2016
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 10, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (May 4).
lower
Apr 21, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Apr 20, 2016
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 13, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Mar 14, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 21, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
Feb 19, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2826
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2826. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline