Tax administration: disclosure of information: Franchise Tax Board and cities and counties.
Summary
Existing law authorizes, until January 1, 2019, a city that has entered into a reciprocal agreement, as defined, with the Franchise Tax Board to exchange tax information, as provided. Existing law requires, until January 1, 2019, upon the request of the Franchise Tax Board, each city that assesses a city business tax or requires a city business license to annually submit to the board specified information relating to the administration of the city's business tax program. Existing law defines the term "city" to include, among others, a city and county. Existing law limits the collection and use of this information and provides that any unauthorized use of this information is punishable as a misdemeanor. This bill would expand these provisions to additionally apply to a county. By expanding the scope of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Jul 2015
Assembly Passage
May 2015
Senate Passage
Jul 2015
Signed into Law
Aug 2015
Introduced Feb 11, 2015
Signed Aug 12, 2015
Floor votes · Senate Jul 9, 2015 · Assembly May 14, 2015
How they voted
28–4
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 33
Jul 9, 2015
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican10
50% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
7
Committee
9
Aug 12, 2015
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jul 9, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (28-4-1)
senate
Jul 9, 2015
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Jun 29, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 17, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (June 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 28, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
May 14, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (60-9-3)
assembly
May 6, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 1.) (May 6).
lower
Apr 28, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (April 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 13, 2015
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to REV. & TAX. suspense file.
lower
Feb 23, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
lower
Feb 12, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 14.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bill Dodd
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 279
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 279. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline