Marriage.
Summary
Existing law enumerates persons who are authorized to solemnize a marriage, including current Members of the Legislature, constitutional officers of this state, Members of Congress of the United States who represent a district within this state, elected mayors, city clerks, and county supervisors. Existing law requires county supervisors, city clerks, and elected mayors to obtain and review from the county clerk all available instructions for marriage solemnization before the county supervisor, city clerk, or mayor first solemnizes a marriage. This bill would additionally authorize former Members of the Legislature and constitutional officers of this state, former Members of Congress of the United States who represented a district within this state, and current and former elected officials of a city, county, or city and county, to solemnize a marriage. The bill would remove the requirement that county supervisors, city clerks, and elected mayors obtain and review all available instructions for marriage solemnization before first solemnizing a marriage. The bill would prohibit a judge, elected official, or city clerk from accepting compensation for solemnizing a marriage and would prohibit those individuals from solemnizing a marriage if they have been removed from office due to committing an offense or have been convicted of a crime that involves moral turpitude, dishonesty, or fraud. The bill would make conforming changes.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
May 2016
Senate Passage
Aug 2016
Signed into Law
Sep 2016
Introduced Feb 19, 2016
Signed Sep 23, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Aug 23, 2016 · Assembly Aug 30, 2016
How they voted
34–0
Passed
Total votes 34
Aug 23, 2016
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
8
Committee
7
Amendments
3
Sep 23, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 30, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (71-3-1)
assembly
Aug 29, 2016
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 75. Noes 3. Page 6398.).
lower
Aug 24, 2016
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 26 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 23, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0)
senate
Jun 16, 2016
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Jun 15, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 14).
upper
May 19, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 3, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (May 3).
lower
Apr 26, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 28, 2016
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 10, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 21, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
Feb 19, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Evan Low
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2761
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2761. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline