AB 2757 California Assembly · 2015-2016 Regular Session

Agricultural workers: wages, hours, and working conditions.

Summary
Existing law sets wage, hour, meal break requirements, and other working conditions for employees and requires an employer to pay overtime wages as specified to an employee who works in excess of a workday or workweek, as defined, and imposes criminal penalties for the violation of these requirements. Existing law exempts agricultural employees from these requirements. Under existing law, the function of the Department of Industrial Relations is to, among other things, foster, promote, and develop the welfare of the wage earners of California, to improve their working conditions, and to advance their opportunities for profitable employment. This bill would remove the exemption for agricultural employees regarding hours, meal breaks, and other working conditions, including specified wage requirements, and would create a schedule that would phase in overtime requirements for agricultural workers, as defined, over the course of 4 years, from 2019 to 2022, inclusive. Beginning January 1, 2022, the bill would require any work performed by a person, employed in an agricultural occupation, in excess of 12 hours in one day to be compensated at the rate of no less than twice the employee's regular rate of pay. The bill would authorize the Governor to delay the implementation of these overtime pay provisions if the Governor also suspends the implementation of a scheduled state minimum wage increase, as specified. The bill would require the Department of Industrial Relations to update a specified wage order for consistency with these provisions. The bill would create a state-mandated local program by including agricultural employees as a class of employees protected by criminal penalties under existing law. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status failed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Apr 2016
Assembly Passage
Jun 2016
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2016 Last action Jun 2, 2016
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 2, 2016

How they voted

3826
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 71
Jun 2, 2016
D Democratic46
38 Yea 2 Nay 6
82% Yea
I Independent1
1 Nay
100% Nay
R Republican24
23 Nay 1
95% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
16
Key actions
3
Committee
5
Amendments
2
Jun 2, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (38-26-7)
assembly
Jun 1, 2016
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 31, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 14. Noes 6.) (May 27).
lower
Apr 20, 2016
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 7, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 6). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 31, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Mar 10, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Feb 21, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
Feb 19, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 22 co-sponsors

Sponsors