Department of Transportation: Prunedale Bypass: County of Monterey: disposition of excess properties.
Summary
Existing law provides that the Department of Transportation has full possession and control of the state highway system and associated property. Existing law generally requires proceeds from the sale of excess state highway property to be made available for other highway purposes. Existing law generally provides for the California Transportation Commission to program available funding for transportation capital projects, other than state highway rehabilitation projects, through the State Transportation Improvement Program process, with available funds subject to various fair share distribution formulas. Existing law, in certain cases, requires the commission to instead reallocate funds from canceled state highway projects to other projects within the same county and exempts those funds from the fair share distribution formulas that would otherwise be applicable. This bill would require the net proceeds from the sale of any excess properties originally acquired for a replacement alignment for State Highway Route 101 in the County of Monterey, known as the former Prunedale Bypass, to be reserved in the State Highway Account for programming and allocation by the commission, with the concurrence of the Transportation Agency for Monterey County, for other state highway projects in the State Highway Route 101 corridor in that county. The bill would exempt these funds from the distribution formulas otherwise applicable to transportation capital improvement funds.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
Jun 2016
Senate Passage
Aug 2016
Vetoed
Sep 2016
Introduced Feb 19, 2016
Vetoed Sep 22, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Aug 18, 2016 · Assembly Jun 2, 2016
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 33
Aug 18, 2016
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
8
Committee
10
Amendments
4
Sep 22, 2016
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 24, 2016
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Aug 18, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-1)
senate
Aug 11, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 11).
upper
Aug 8, 2016
Committee
Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Aug 1, 2016
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 29, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 9, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
Jun 2, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (48-21-2)
assembly
May 31, 2016
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 27, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 14. Noes 3.) (May 27).
lower
May 11, 2016
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 26, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 25, 2016
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 21, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 2.) (April 18).
lower
Mar 10, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Feb 21, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
Feb 19, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Luis Alejo
DDemocratic
Co
Anthony Cannella
RRepublican
Co
Mark Stone
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2730
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2730. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline