Courts: interpreters.
Summary
Under existing law, if a witness in a court action is incapable of understanding the English language or is incapable of expressing himself or herself in the English language so as to be understood directly by counsel, court, and jury, an interpreter whom the witness can understand and who can understand the witness must be sworn to interpret for the witness. Existing law requires an interpreter to take an oath that he or she will make a true interpretation to the witness in a language that the witness understands and that the interpreter will make a true interpretation of the witness' answers to questions to counsel, court, or jury, in the English language, with the interpreter's best skill and judgment. This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to the latter provision.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2016
Last action Feb 22, 2016
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
3
Key actions
0
Committee
1
Feb 21, 2016
Assembly · Reported by committee
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
Feb 19, 2016
Assembly · Introduced
Introduced. To print.
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Kansen Chu
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2727
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2727. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline