Registered sex offenders: interactive video games: meeting with minors.
Summary
Existing law, the Sex Offender Registration Act, last amended by Proposition 35, as approved by the voters at the November 6, 2012, statewide general election, requires a person convicted of certain crimes, as specified, to register with law enforcement as a sex offender for the rest of his or her life while residing in California or while attending school or working in California, as specified. Existing law makes it a crime for a person who is motivated by an unnatural or abnormal sexual interest in children to arrange a meeting with a minor or a person he or she believes to be a minor for the purpose of exposing his or her genitals or pubic or rectal area, having the child expose his or her genitals or pubic or rectal area, or engaging in lewd or lascivious behavior. Existing law makes the crime punishable by a fine not exceeding $5,000, by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by both the fine and imprisonment. This bill would make it a crime, punishable by a fine not exceeding $5,000, by imprisonment in a state prison not exceeding one year, or by both the fine and imprisonment, for a registered sex offender to use an interactive video game to encourage another user of the interactive video game who is a minor to physically travel to a specified location for the purpose of meeting the minor. By creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
Apr 2016
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2016
Last action Aug 16, 2016
Floor votes · Assembly Apr 28, 2016
How they voted
74–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 78
Apr 28, 2016
D
Democratic52
98% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican25
88% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
4
Committee
10
Aug 16, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(c).
upper
Jun 27, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Jun 15, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 18, 2016
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
May 5, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
Apr 28, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (74-0-4)
assembly
Apr 20, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 20).
lower
Apr 5, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 4). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 28, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Mar 17, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Feb 21, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
Feb 19, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ling Ling Chang
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2682
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2682. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline