Civil rights: Unruh Civil Rights Act: waivers.
Summary
The Unruh Civil Rights Act provides that all persons within the jurisdiction of this state are entitled to full and equal accommodations in all business establishments regardless of their sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sexual orientation, citizenship, primary language, or immigration status. This bill would require a waiver of a legal right, penalty, remedy, forum, or procedure for a violation of the Unruh Civil Rights Act, including the right to file and pursue a civil action or complaint with, or otherwise notify, the Attorney General or any other public prosecutor, or law enforcement agency, the Department of Fair Employment and Housing, or any other governmental entity, to be knowing and voluntary, in writing, and expressly not made as a condition of entering into a contract for goods or services or as a condition of providing or receiving goods and services. The bill, among other things, would require a person who seeks to enforce a waiver of any legal right, penalty, remedy, forum, or procedure for a violation of the act to have the burden of proving that the waiver was knowing and voluntary and not made as a condition of the contract or of providing or receiving the goods or services. The bill would provide that, with certain exceptions, it applies to any agreement to waive a legal right, penalty, remedy, forum, or procedure for a violation of the act, including an agreement to accept private arbitration, entered into, altered, modified, renewed, or extended on or after January 1, 2017. The bill would provide that nothing in these provisions shall prohibit a person from knowingly and voluntarily entering into binding arbitration. The bill also would make findings and declarations.
Bill status
failed
2 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Apr 2016
Assembly Failed
May 2016
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2016
Last action Aug 15, 2016
Floor votes · Assembly May 31, 2016
How they voted
36–33
Failed · 6 other
Total votes 75
May 31, 2016
D
Democratic50
72% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Nay
R
Republican24
95% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
14
Key actions
2
Committee
4
May 31, 2016
Vote failed
Assembly Vote: fail (36-33-6)
assembly
Apr 26, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (April 26).
lower
Mar 16, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 14, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 21, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
Feb 19, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Tony Thurmond
DDemocratic
Co
Mark Stone
DDemocratic
Co
Rob Bonta
DDemocratic
Co
Shirley N. Weber
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2667
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2667. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline