Property taxation: certificated aircraft assessment.
Summary
Existing property tax law requires the personal property of an air carrier to be taxed at its fair market value, and the California Constitution requires property subject to ad valorem property taxation to be assessed in the county in which it is situated. Existing law, for the 2005–06 fiscal year to the 2016–17 fiscal year, inclusive, specifies a formula to determine the fair market value of certificated aircraft of a commercial air carrier, and rebuttably presumes that the amount determined pursuant to this formula is the fair market value of the certificated aircraft. This bill would extend the 2016–17 fiscal year termination date to the 2019–20 fiscal year for the above-described provisions relating to the determination of the fair market value and taxation of certificated aircraft. Existing law, until December 31, 2016, requires the Aircraft Advisory Subcommittee of the California Assessors' Association to designate, after soliciting input from commercial air carriers operating in the state, a lead county assessor's office for each commercial air carrier operating certificated aircraft in this state in an assessment year, and requires the lead county assessor to calculate the value of the air carrier's personal property and to transmit these calculations to other county assessors, but specifies that each county assessor is responsible for assessing and enrolling the taxable value of the property in his or her county, as provided. Existing law, until December 31, 2016, also requires the lead county assessor's office to lead a team to audit the books and records of commercial air carriers and requires a commercial air carrier that receives a notice of the designation of a lead county assessor's office to file one signed property statement with the lead county assessor's office for its personal property at all airport locations and fixtures at all airport locations. Existing law requires the lead county assessor's office to receive the property statement of each commercial air carrier to which he or she is assigned. This bill would extend the December 31, 2016, inoperative or repeal date to December 31, 2019, for the above-described provisions. The bill, on or before March 1, 2017, would additionally require the Aircraft Advisory Subcommittee of the California Assessors' Association to designate contacts in each lead county assessor's office for each commercial air carrier to address specified issues and to establish best practices for the effective administration of the lead county system and audit process. The bill would require the lead county assessor's office to transmit the property statement to the assessor of each county in which the personal property of the commercial air carrier is located or has acquired situs, including certificated aircraft. The bill would require a county assessor that receives a property statement from the lead county assessor's office to direct questions about the contents of the property statement first to the lead county assessor's office and then, if the lead county assessor's office is unable to provide an answer, to the commercial air carrier that filed the property statement. By extending the application of the aforementioned valuation process for certificated aircraft beyond the 2016–17 fiscal year, thereby imposing new duties upon a lead county assessor's office, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
Jun 2016
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2016
Last action Aug 23, 2016
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 1, 2016
How they voted
49–27
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 78
Jun 1, 2016
D
Democratic52
92% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Nay
R
Republican25
92% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
6
Committee
10
Amendments
5
Aug 11, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 11).
upper
Aug 8, 2016
Committee
Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Aug 2, 2016
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 1, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 29).
upper
Jun 13, 2016
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 9, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Jun 1, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (49-27-2)
assembly
May 19, 2016
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 18, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 14. Noes 6.) (May 18).
lower
Apr 27, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 26, 2016
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 25, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (April 18).
lower
Apr 13, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
lower
Mar 28, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
lower
Mar 17, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
lower
Feb 21, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
Feb 19, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2622
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2622. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline