Foster care: parenting youth.
Summary
Existing law establishes the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, which may adjudge a child to be a dependent of the court under certain circumstances, including when the child has been left without any provision for support or when a parent or guardian fails to provide the child with adequate food, clothing, shelter, or medical treatment. Existing law provides that the Legislature declares that a child whose parent has been adjudged a dependent child of the court shall not be considered at risk of abuse or neglect solely because of the age, dependent status, or foster care status of the parent. This bill would additionally declare that a child whose parent has been adjudged a dependent child of the court shall not be considered at risk of abuse or neglect solely on the basis of information concerning the parent's placement history, past behaviors, health or mental health diagnoses occurring prior to the pregnancy, except as specified. Existing law provides that reunification services need not be provided to the family of a dependent child under certain circumstances. This bill would enact certain exceptions to that provision that would apply in the case of a child for whom one or both minor parents have been adjudged to be dependent children of the juvenile court, thereby providing the family access to reunification services. The bill would also require, in those cases, a party seeking an involuntary foster care placement of, or termination of parental rights over, a child born to a parent or parents who were minors at the time of the child's birth to demonstrate to the court that reasonable efforts were made to provide remedial services designed to prevent the removal of the child from the minor parent or parents, that these efforts have proved unsuccessful, and that those efforts utilize the available resources of the child and his or her minor parent or parents extended family, social services agencies, caregivers, and other available service providers. By imposing a higher level of service on county employees, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law requires the clerk of the superior court to open a separate court file for nonminor dependents under the dependency, delinquency, or transition jurisdiction of the court and limits access to those files. This bill would require the clerk of the superior court to maintain court files and records concerning a minor dependent parent or a nonminor dependent parent separate from court files and records concerning his or her child, as specified. The bill would authorize dependency court records concerning a minor dependent parent or a nonminor dependent parent to be disclosed to the county and the court in the child's dependency proceedings, but would require information from the records to only be admitted as evidence in the child's dependency proceedings pursuant to a certain court order. The bill would authorize any party to the child's dependency proceedings to request the admittance of the records concerning a minor dependent parent or a nonminor dependent parent as evidence at any stage of the child's dependency proceedings. Existing law declares the intent of the Legislature to maintain the continuity of the family unit and to support and preserve families headed by minor dependent parents and nonminor dependent parents. Existing law requires foster care placements for minor parents and their children to demonstrate a willingness and ability to provide support and assistance to minor parents and their children. This bill would additionally require those foster care placements to support the preservation of the family unit and to refer a minor dependent parent or nonminor dependent parent to preventive services to address any concerns regarding the safety, health, or well-being of the child, and to help prevent, whenever possible, the filing of a petition to declare the child a dependent of the juvenile court. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Sep 2015
Assembly Passage
Jun 2015
Senate Passage
Sep 2015
Signed into Law
Oct 2015
Introduced Feb 9, 2015
Signed Oct 6, 2015
Floor votes · Senate Sep 9, 2015 · Assembly Jun 2, 2015
How they voted
35–0
Passed
Total votes 35
Sep 9, 2015
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
8
Committee
15
Amendments
2
Oct 6, 2015
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 10, 2015
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 3075.).
lower
Sep 9, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0)
senate
Sep 9, 2015
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 27, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 27).
upper
Aug 17, 2015
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 17, 2015
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 6, 2015
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 2, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 30).
upper
Jun 23, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 23). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 11, 2015
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HUMAN S. and JUD.
upper
Jun 2, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (73-0-2)
assembly
May 28, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 28).
lower
May 6, 2015
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 21, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 15, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (April 14). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 8, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Mar 24, 2015
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Feb 17, 2015
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HUM. S. and JUD.
lower
Feb 10, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 12.
lower
0 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 260
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 260. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline