Registered sex offenders.
Summary
Existing law requires the Department of Justice to make available specified information about registered sex offenders via an Internet Web site. Existing law authorizes an offender who has been convicted of the commission or attempted commission of an offense for which the offender is on probation at the time of his or her application or has successfully completed probation to apply for exclusion from the Internet Web site if he or she submits a certified copy of an official court document, as specified, that clearly demonstrates that the offender was the victim's parent, stepparent, sibling, or grandparent, and the crime did not involve specified sexual offenses. This bill would require a local assistance center for victims and witnesses, as specified, prior to the department granting an application for an exclusion pursuant to the above specified provision, to speak to the victim to determine if granting the exclusion would be in the best interest of the victim, as provided. The bill would require that an offender who is on probation at the time of his or her application for an exclusion be on probation for at least one year prior to the granting of his or her exclusion. By imposing additional duties on local government agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
Jun 2016
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2016
Last action Aug 11, 2016
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 1, 2016
How they voted
76–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 78
Jun 1, 2016
D
Democratic52
96% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican25
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
5
Committee
8
Amendments
5
Aug 11, 2016
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 8, 2016
Committee
Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Aug 2, 2016
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 1, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 3.) (June 28).
upper
Jun 9, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 1, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (76-0-2)
assembly
May 27, 2016
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 27, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 20. Noes 0.) (May 27).
lower
May 11, 2016
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 26, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 25, 2016
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 21, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 20).
lower
Mar 8, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 21, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
Feb 19, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Melissa A. Melendez
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2569
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2569. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline