AB 2533 California Assembly · 2015-2016 Regular Session

Public safety officers: recording devices: release of recordings.

Summary
The Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act grants certain rights to public safety officers, as defined, including that a public safety officer is not required, as a condition of employment, to consent to the use of his or her photograph or identity as a public safety officer on the Internet for any purpose if the public safety officer reasonably believes that the disclosure may result in a threat, harassment, intimidation, or harm to the officer or the officer's family. That act authorizes a public safety officer, based upon the above-described reasonable belief, to notify a public agency to cease and desist from disclosing the officer's identity on the Internet and authorizes the officer, a district attorney, or a United States Attorney to seek an injunction prohibiting any official or unofficial use by the public agency on the Internet of the officer's photograph or identity as a public safety officer. This bill would require a public safety officer to be provided a minimum of 3 business days' notice before a public safety department or other public agency releases on the Internet any audio or video of the officer recorded by the officer. The bill authorizes the public safety officer, based upon that reasonable belief, to notify the public safety department or other public agency to cease and desist from disclosing on the Internet any audio or video of the officer that is recorded by the officer and authorizes the officer, a district attorney, or a United States Attorney to seek an injunction to prohibit the release of that audio or video on the Internet. To the extent that these new requirements would apply to local government employers, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status failed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Jun 2016
Assembly Passage
May 2016
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2016 Last action Jun 28, 2016
Floor votes · Assembly May 19, 2016

How they voted

69–1
Passed · 8 other
Total votes 78
May 19, 2016
D Democratic52
48 Yea 4
92% Yea
I Independent1
1 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican25
20 Yea 1 Nay 4
80% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
19
Key actions
6
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Jun 21, 2016
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 26, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 19, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-1-8)
assembly
May 4, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 20. Noes 0.) (May 4).
lower
Apr 20, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 19). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 18, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.
lower
Apr 14, 2016
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 13, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 12).
lower
Apr 5, 2016
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 8, 2016
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and P. & C.P.
lower
Feb 21, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
Feb 19, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Miguel Santiago
Miguel Santiago
DDemocratic
CA
54