Victim restitution: jurisdiction.
Summary
Existing law requires a court to impose a separate and additional restitution fine in each case in which a person is convicted of a crime. If the economic losses of a victim cannot be ascertained at the time of sentencing, existing law requires a court to retain jurisdiction over a person subject to a restitution order for purposes of imposing or modifying restitution until such time as the losses may be determined. Two state appellate court decisions have held that under state law a court acts in excess of its jurisdiction by ordering restitution or modifying a restitution order after the explanation of a defendant's probation. This bill would expressly abrogate the holdings in those decisions by requiring the court to retain jurisdiction over a defendant for purposes of imposing or modifying restitution at any time.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2016
Last action Apr 21, 2016
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
7
Key actions
2
Committee
3
Apr 21, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
lower
Mar 8, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 21, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
Feb 19, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jim Patterson
RRepublican
Co
Mike Gatto
DDemocratic
Co
Tom Lackey
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2477
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2477. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline