Health care districts: dissolution.
Summary
Existing law, the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, provides the authority and procedures for the initiation, conduct, and completion of changes of organization and reorganization of cities and districts by local agency formation commissions. Existing law establishes the procedures for the dissolution of the existence of a district and sets forth provisions for winding up the affairs of a dissolved district, as specified. Existing law generally authorizes the dissolution of a district without voter approval, except as specified. Notwithstanding those provisions, existing law subjects the dissolution of a health care district to voter approval. This bill would require the Alameda County local agency formation commission to order the dissolution of the Eden Township Healthcare District if that health care district meets certain criteria, as specified. The bill would subject a dissolution under these provisions to specified provisions of the act that require dissolution by voter approval only if a majority protest exists, as specified. By requiring a higher level of service from the Alameda County local agency formation commission to analyze the criteria described above, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Eden Township Healthcare District in Alameda County. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
May 2016
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2016
Last action Aug 29, 2016
Floor votes · Assembly May 12, 2016
How they voted
68–0
Passed · 10 other
Total votes 78
May 12, 2016
D
Democratic52
94% Yea
I
Independent1
0% Nay
R
Republican25
76% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
16
Key actions
4
Committee
6
Amendments
2
Aug 1, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Aug 1, 2016
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 22, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 19, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
May 12, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-10)
assembly
May 10, 2016
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 9, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (May 4).
lower
Mar 8, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 21, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
Feb 19, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2471
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2471. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline