Parole: placement at release.
Summary
Existing law generally requires that an inmate released on parole or postrelease community supervision be returned to the county of last legal residence. Existing law provides, however, that an inmate who is released on parole for an offense involving stalking shall not be returned to a location within 35 miles of the victim's actual residence or place of employment if specified criteria are satisfied. This bill would make that provision applicable to an inmate released on postrelease community supervision. The bill would also authorize a supervising county agency to transfer an inmate who is released on postrelease community supervision to another county, upon approval of the receiving county, when the inmate cannot be placed in his or her county of last legal residence in compliance with this provision. The bill would make other clarifying changes. By imposing additional duties on supervising county agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Sep 2015
Assembly Passage
Apr 2015
Senate Passage
Sep 2015
Signed into Law
Oct 2015
Introduced Feb 4, 2015
Signed Oct 5, 2015
Floor votes · Senate Sep 2, 2015 · Assembly Sep 3, 2015
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 33
Sep 2, 2015
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
7
Committee
11
Amendments
1
Oct 5, 2015
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 3, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-0-2)
assembly
Sep 3, 2015
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2866.).
lower
Sep 2, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-1)
senate
Sep 2, 2015
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 4 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 27, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 27).
upper
Jun 22, 2015
Committee
In committee: Referred to suspense file.
upper
Jun 9, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 26, 2015
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 14, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Apr 22, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 22).
lower
Mar 24, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (March 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 17, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 9, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 5, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 7.
lower
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Susan Eggman
DDemocratic
Co
Cristina Garcia
DDemocratic
Co
Lorena Gonzalez
DDemocratic
Co
Marie Waldron
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 231
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 231. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline