Digital signatures.
Summary
Existing law, the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, provides that a record or signature may not be denied legal effect or enforceability solely because it is in electronic form and defines an electronic signature for purposes of the act. Existing provisions of the Government Code authorize the use of a digital signature in any written communication with a public entity, and specifies that in those communications, the use of a digital signature has the same force and effect as the use of a manual signature if it complies with specified requirements. This bill would express the intent of the Legislature to clarify that a digital signature may be used to satisfy the requirements of an electronic signature under the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act. The bill would, for purposes of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, provide that an electronic signature includes a digital signature under the above described provisions of the Government Code and that a digital signature under those provisions is a type of an electronic signature as set forth in the Uniform Electronic Transaction Act. The bill would also revise the above-described provisions of the Government Code by specifying that if a public entity elects to use a digital signature, that meets specified requirements, the digital signature has the same force and effect of a manual signature in any communication with the public entity.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
May 2016
Senate Passage
Jun 2016
Signed into Law
Aug 2016
Introduced Feb 18, 2016
Signed Aug 19, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Jun 30, 2016 · Assembly Aug 8, 2016
How they voted
37–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 40
Jun 30, 2016
D
Democratic26
92% Yea
R
Republican14
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Amendments
3
Aug 19, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 8, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (75-0-3)
assembly
Aug 8, 2016
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 5741.).
lower
Jun 30, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (37-0-3)
senate
Jun 30, 2016
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after July 29 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 21, 2016
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Jun 20, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 14).
upper
May 12, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 26, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 26).
lower
Apr 20, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 28, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 17, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 19, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Evan Low
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2296
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2296. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline