Theft: shoplifting.
Summary
(1) The existing Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act, enacted as an initiative statute by Proposition 47, as approved by the electors at the November 4, 2014, statewide general election, makes the theft of property that does not exceed $950 in value petty theft, and makes that crime punishable as a misdemeanor, with certain exceptions. The initiative statute defines shoplifting as entering a commercial establishment with the intent to commit larceny while that establishment is open during regular hours, where the value of the property that is taken or intended to be taken does not exceed $950. The initiative statute requires that shoplifting be punished as a misdemeanor. The California Constitution authorizes the Legislature to amend or repeal an initiative statute by another statute that becomes effective when approved by the electors. This bill would amend that initiative statute by making it grand theft, which is punishable as a misdemeanor or a felony, to commit shoplifting if the aggregate value of the property taken from a single commercial establishment is nine hundred fifty dollars ($950) or more in any 180-day period. (2) Existing law makes it a crime, punishable as a misdemeanor or a felony, for 2 or more persons to conspire to commit any crime. This bill would specify that the crime of conspiracy occurs when 2 or more persons conspire to commit shoplifting. (3) This bill would call a special election to be consolidated with the November 8, 2016, statewide general election. This bill would require the Secretary of State to submit the provisions of the bill that amend the initiative statute to the electors for their approval at the November 8, 2016, consolidated election. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an act calling an election.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Jun 2016
Assembly Passage
May 2016
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 18, 2016
Last action Jun 21, 2016
Floor votes · Assembly May 12, 2016
How they voted
76–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 78
May 12, 2016
D
Democratic52
96% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican25
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
17
Key actions
4
Committee
10
Jun 21, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 16, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jun 16, 2016
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 15, 2016
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
May 19, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
May 12, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (76-0-2)
assembly
May 4, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 20. Noes 0.) (May 4).
lower
Apr 21, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 21. Noes 0.) (April 20). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 28, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
Mar 17, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
Feb 19, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2287
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2287. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline