School accountability: dropout recovery high schools.
Summary
Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction, with approval of the State Board of Education, to develop an Academic Performance Index (API) , as part of the Public School Performance Accountability Program, to measure the performance of schools and school districts, especially the academic performance of pupils. The API consists of a variety of indicators including specified achievement test scores, attendance rates, and graduation rates. Existing law requires the Superintendent, with approval of the state board, to develop an alternative accountability system for specified types of schools, including, among others, community day schools and continuation schools. Existing law allows these schools to receive an API score, but prohibits them from being included in the API rankings of schools. Existing law, until January 1, 2017, requires the Superintendent and the state board, as part of the alternative accountability system for schools, or any successor system, to allow no more than 10 dropout recovery high schools, as defined, to report the results of an individual pupil growth model that is proposed by the school and certified by the Superintendent pursuant to specified criteria instead of reporting other indicators. This bill would extend the repeal date of that provision to January 1, 2020, and would update cross-references.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
Apr 2016
Senate Passage
Aug 2016
Signed into Law
Sep 2016
Introduced Feb 18, 2016
Signed Sep 16, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Aug 23, 2016 · Assembly Apr 21, 2016
How they voted
34–0
Passed
Total votes 34
Aug 23, 2016
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
7
Committee
9
Sep 16, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 23, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0)
senate
Aug 23, 2016
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Aug 11, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 11).
upper
Jun 20, 2016
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 8, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 5, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Apr 21, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (74-0-1)
assembly
Apr 13, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 20. Noes 0.) (April 13).
lower
Apr 7, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 6). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 3, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 19, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jose Medina
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2259
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2259. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline