Highways: exit information signs.
Summary
Existing law requires the Department of Transportation to adopt rules and regulations that allow the placement, near exits on freeways in rural areas, of information signs identifying specific roadside businesses. Existing law generally prohibits the department from approving the placement of any sign within any urban area with a population of 5,000 or more. However existing law also requires the department, until January 1, 2021, to allow the placement of information signs along State Highway Route 65 within, or at exits leading to, the City of Lincoln, and requires the department to report, by January 1, 2020, to the transportation committees of the Senate and Assembly on the implementation of this provision and on its recommendations as to whether the period of this authorization should be extended, and whether the authorization should be expanded to other urban areas. This bill would additionally require the department, until January 1, 2021, to allow the placement of information signs along Interstate 80 within, or at exits leading to, the City of Truckee, as specified.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Jul 2015
Assembly Passage
Apr 2015
Senate Passage
Jul 2015
Signed into Law
Aug 2015
Introduced Feb 3, 2015
Signed Aug 11, 2015
Floor votes · Senate Jul 9, 2015 · Assembly Jul 13, 2015
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 33
Jul 9, 2015
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
8
Committee
10
Amendments
1
Aug 11, 2015
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jul 13, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-0-2)
assembly
Jul 13, 2015
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2352.).
lower
Jul 9, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-1)
senate
Jul 9, 2015
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after July 11 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jul 6, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 24, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 15, 2015
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
May 14, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
Apr 22, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 22).
lower
Apr 7, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (April 6). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 19, 2015
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Feb 17, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Feb 4, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 6.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 223
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 223. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline