AB 2163 California Assembly · 2015-2016 Regular Session

Net energy metering: Imperial Irrigation District.

Summary
Existing law requires every electric utility, defined to include an electrical corporation, local publicly owned electric utility, or an electrical cooperative, to develop a standard contract or tariff providing for net energy metering, as defined, and to make this contract or tariff available to eligible customer-generators upon request for generation by a renewable electrical generation facility. An electric utility, upon request, is required to make available to eligible customer-generators contracts or tariffs for net energy metering, on a first-come-first-served basis until the time that the total rated generating capacity used by eligible customer-generators exceeds 5% of the electric utility's aggregate customer peak demand. Existing law provides that an electric utility that is not a large electrical corporation is not obligated to provide net energy metering to customers in its service area once the above level is reached. The bill would require the Imperial Irrigation District to provide net metering service to eligible customer-generators that meet certain requirements, as specified. Because this bill would increase the level of service provided by a local publicly owned utility, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Imperial Irrigation District. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status passed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
Jun 2016
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 17, 2016 Last action Aug 31, 2016
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 1, 2016

How they voted

4225
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 71
Jun 1, 2016
D Democratic46
41 Yea 1 Nay 4
89% Yea
I Independent1
1 Nay
100% Nay
R Republican24
1 Yea 23 Nay
95% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
23
Key actions
7
Committee
14
Aug 31, 2016
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Aug 30, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
Aug 22, 2016
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(c). Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Aug 1, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 29, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 22, 2016
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Jun 16, 2016
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 15, 2016
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Testimony taken. Further hearing to be set.
upper
Jun 9, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Jun 1, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (42-25-4)
assembly
May 27, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 6.) (May 27).
lower
Apr 27, 2016
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 13, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 5.) (April 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Feb 29, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
lower
Feb 18, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
DW
Das Williams
DDemocratic
CA
37