In-home supportive services.
Summary
Existing law establishes the county-administered In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program, under which qualified aged, blind, and disabled persons are provided with services in order to permit them to remain in their own homes and avoid institutionalization. Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid program provisions. Existing law establishes, as part of the Coordinated Care Initiative, the In-Home Supportive Services Employer-Employee Relations Act, which serves to resolve disputes regarding wages, benefits, and other terms and conditions of employment between the California In-Home Supportive Services Authority (Statewide Authority) and recognized employee organizations providing in-home supportive services. Existing law establishes the Statewide Authority and requires the authority to be the entity authorized to meet and confer in good faith regarding wages, benefits, and other terms and conditions of employment with representatives of recognized employee organizations for any individual provider who is employed by a recipient of supportive services. Existing law provides, as part of the Coordinated Care Initiative, that IHSS is a Medi-Cal benefit available through managed care health plans in specified counties. Existing law requires enrollment of eligible Medi-Cal beneficiaries into managed care pursuant to a specified demonstration project or other provisions, including managed care for long-term services and supports, as one of the conditions required to be completed before the Statewide Authority assumes specified responsibilities. Existing law requires the Statewide Authority, no sooner than March 1, 2013, to assume specified responsibilities in a county upon notification by the Director of Health Care Services that the enrollment of eligible Medi-Cal beneficiaries described in specified provisions of law has been completed in that county. Under existing law, the date of assumption of these responsibilities by the Statewide Authority is known as the county implementation date. This bill would, instead, make the implementation date January 1, 2016, would delete the reference to the "county" implementation date, and would make conforming changes. Existing law conditions implementation of the Coordinated Care Initiative, as defined, on whether the Director of Finance estimates that the Coordinated Care Initiative will generate net General Fund savings, as specified. Existing law, with certain exceptions, specifies those provisions of law that are within the scope of the initiative to become inoperative if this condition is not met. This bill would modify the definition of the Coordinate Care Initiative for the purposes of determining which provisions become inoperative if the condition is not met, and exclude, among others, those provisions that establish the In-Home Supportive Services Employer-Employee Relations Act; establish the Statewide Authority and determine the duties of, and when those duties are assumed by, the authority; establish the IHSS Fund, which is used to fund the Statewide Authority; and require all counties, commencing July 1, 2012, to have a County IHSS Maintenance of Effort (MOE) and to pay the County IHSS MOE instead of paying the nonfederal share of IHSS costs, as specified. The bill would make conforming changes.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Aug 2015
Assembly Passage
Jun 2015
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 2, 2015
Last action Sep 2, 2015
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 2, 2015
How they voted
52–18
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 72
Jun 2, 2015
D
Democratic47
97% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican24
70% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
16
Key actions
4
Committee
9
Aug 27, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 27).
upper
Jul 6, 2015
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 23, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 1.) (June 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 11, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
Jun 2, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (52-18-2)
assembly
May 28, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 3.) (May 28).
lower
Apr 15, 2015
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.
lower
Mar 25, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (March 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Feb 9, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Feb 3, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 5.
lower
1 primary · 12 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jimmy Gomez
DDemocratic
Co
Anthony Cannella
RRepublican
Co
David Chiu
DDemocratic
Co
Freddie Rodriguez
DDemocratic
Co
Isadore Hall
DDemocratic
Co
Jose Medina
DDemocratic
Co
Kansen Chu
DDemocratic
Co
Luis Alejo
DDemocratic
Co
Marc Levine
DDemocratic
Co
Mike Gipson
DDemocratic
Co
RH
Roger Hernández
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 211
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 211. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline