Sanctions: jurors.
Summary
Existing law authorizes a judicial officer to impose reasonable money sanctions, not to exceed $1,500, payable to the court, for any violation of a lawful court order by a person, done without good cause or substantial justification. For purposes of this provision, the term "person" includes a witness, a party, or a party's attorney. Existing law requires that certain fees and fines collected by superior courts, including the money sanctions described above, be deposited into a bank account established by the Administrative Office of the Courts for distribution, as specified, with the balance transmitted to the State Treasury for deposit in the Trial Court Trust Fund and other funds as required by law. This bill would require the Judicial Council to solicit courts for participation in a pilot project in which judicial officers of participating counties would be authorized by the bill to impose reasonable monetary sanctions, not to exceed $1,500, on an impaneled juror for any knowing violation of a lawful court order, done without good cause or substantial justification, that is supported by clear and convincing evidence. The bill would require that these monetary sanctions be deposited into a bank account for distribution, as described above, with the balance deposited into the Trial Court Trust Fund and other funds. The bill would require the Judicial Council to conduct an evaluation of the pilot project and report the results to the Governor and the Legislature on or before January 1, 2021. The bill would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2022.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
Apr 2016
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 17, 2016
Last action Aug 11, 2016
Floor votes · Assembly Apr 28, 2016
How they voted
67–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 71
Apr 28, 2016
D
Democratic46
97% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican24
87% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
17
Key actions
4
Committee
10
Amendments
1
Aug 11, 2016
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 1, 2016
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Aug 1, 2016
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 21, 2016
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 20, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 14).
upper
May 5, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 28, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-0-4)
assembly
Apr 20, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 20).
lower
Apr 5, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 4, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 29, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 18, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Richard Gordon
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2101
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2101. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline