Interagency child death review.
Summary
Existing law authorizes a county to establish an interagency child death review team to assist local agencies in identifying and reviewing suspicious child deaths and facilitating communication among persons who perform autopsies and the various persons and agencies involved in child abuse or neglect cases. Existing law requires records that are exempt from disclosure to 3rd parties pursuant to state or federal law to remain exempt from disclosure when they are in the possession of a child death review team. This bill would authorize the voluntary disclosure of specified information, including mental health records, criminal history information, and child abuse reports, by an individual or agency to an interagency child death review team. The bill would provide that written or oral information disclosed to a child death review team pursuant to these provisions would remain confidential, and would not be subject to disclosure or discovery by a 3rd party unless otherwise required by law. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
Apr 2016
Senate Passage
Aug 2016
Signed into Law
Sep 2016
Introduced Feb 17, 2016
Signed Sep 12, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Aug 11, 2016 · Assembly Apr 28, 2016
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 34
Aug 11, 2016
D
Democratic24
91% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
8
Committee
9
Amendments
1
Sep 12, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 18, 2016
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 5870.).
lower
Aug 11, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-2)
senate
Aug 11, 2016
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 14 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 29, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 21, 2016
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 14, 2016
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 8, 2016
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 5, 2016
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and APPR.
upper
Apr 28, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (73-0-2)
assembly
Apr 20, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 19).
lower
Feb 29, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 18, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Kansen Chu
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2083
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2083. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline