Change of organization: cities: disincorporation.
Summary
(1) Existing law, the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, requires the executive officer of a local agency formation commission to prepare a comprehensive fiscal analysis for any proposal that includes a disincorporation, as specified. Existing law requires the comprehensive fiscal analysis to include, among other things, a review and documentation of specified costs associated with the proposed disincorporation. This bill would additionally require the comprehensive fiscal analysis to include a review and documentation of all current and long-term liabilities of the city proposed for disincorporation and the potential financing mechanism or mechanisms to address any identified shortfalls and obligations, as specified. (2) The act states the intent of the Legislature that a proposal that includes a disincorporation of a city result in a determination that the debt or contractual obligations and responsibilities of the city being disincorporated be the responsibility of the same territory for repayment. To ascertain this information, the act requires the city being disincorporated to provide a written statement that includes specified information relating to its debts and contractual obligations. This bill would additionally require that statement to include the amount of any assessment due the city that is unpaid or uncollected. (3) The act requires the county tax collector to collect a tax that has been levied by the disincorporated city that remains uncollected. This bill would additionally require the county tax collector to collect an assessment that has been levied by the disincorporated city that remains uncollected. By imposing new duties on local officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) The act requires the board of supervisors to provide for the collection of debts due to a city being disincorporated and to wind up its affairs, as specified. This bill would instead require the governing board of the successor to provide for the collection of debts due to the city and to wind up its affairs, as specified. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
May 2016
Senate Passage
Jun 2016
Signed into Law
Aug 2016
Introduced Feb 16, 2016
Signed Aug 22, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Jun 30, 2016 · Assembly Aug 4, 2016
How they voted
31–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 33
Jun 30, 2016
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
8
Committee
13
Amendments
1
Aug 22, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 4, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-3)
assembly
Aug 4, 2016
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 5699.).
lower
Jun 30, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-2)
senate
Jun 30, 2016
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after July 29 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 27, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Jun 15, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 6, 2016
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
May 26, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
May 11, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 20. Noes 0.) (May 11).
lower
Apr 21, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 20). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 12, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Apr 11, 2016
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 6, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Mar 28, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Mar 17, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 17, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Eric Linder
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2032
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2032. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline