Transportation districts: contracts.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires contracts of the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District for the purchase of supplies, equipment, and materials to be let to the lowest responsible bidder or to the bidder who submits a proposal that provides best value, as defined, if the amount of the contract exceeds $100,000 and requires the district to obtain a minimum of 3 quotations for those contracts between $2,500 and $100,000. Existing law requires the district, if the contract is for the construction of facilities and works, to let the contract to the lowest responsible bidder if the amount of the contract exceeds $10,000 and to obtain a minimum of 3 quotations for those contracts between $2,500 and $10,000. This bill would instead impose those bidding requirements with respect to district contracts for the purchase of supplies, equipment, and materials if the amount of the contract exceeds $150,000 and would require a minimum of 3 quotations for those contracts between $5,000 and $150,000. The bill would also require, with respect to district contracts for the construction of facilities and works, a minimum of 3 quotations for those contracts between $5,000 and $10,000. (2) Existing law requires contracts of the San Mateo County Transit District for the purchase of supplies, equipment, and materials to be let to the lowest responsible bidder or to the bidder who submits a proposal that provides best value, as defined, if the amount of the contract exceeds $100,000 and requires the district, to the extent practicable, to obtain a minimum of 3 quotations for those contracts between $2,500 and $100,000. This bill would instead impose those bidding requirements if the amount of the contracts exceeds $150,000 and would require a minimum of 3 quotations for contracts between $5,000 and $150,000.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
May 2016
Senate Passage
Jun 2016
Signed into Law
Aug 2016
Introduced Feb 16, 2016
Signed Aug 19, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Jun 30, 2016 · Assembly May 12, 2016
How they voted
37–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 40
Jun 30, 2016
D
Democratic26
92% Yea
R
Republican14
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Amendments
1
Aug 19, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 4, 2016
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 75. Noes 1. Page 5698.).
lower
Jun 30, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (37-0-3)
senate
Jun 30, 2016
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after July 29 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 22, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 21).
upper
Jun 1, 2016
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
May 19, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
May 12, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (71-1-6)
assembly
May 5, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (May 4).
lower
Apr 27, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Mar 17, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 17, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Kevin Mullin
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2030
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2030. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline