Juveniles: out-of-state placement.
Summary
Existing law establishes the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, under which the juvenile court may adjudge a person who is under 18 years of age when he or she violates any law or ordinance to be a ward of the court, as specified. Existing law authorizes the court to make any reasonable orders for the care, supervision, custody, conduct, maintenance, and support of the minor who is adjudged a ward of the court. In the discretion of the court, existing law authorizes the court to order a ward to be on probation without the supervision of the probation officer. In all other cases, existing law requires the court to order the care, custody, and control of the minor to be under the supervision of a probation officer who is required to determine the appropriate placement for the ward, and authorizes the probation agency to place the minor in specified treatment settings, including the approved home of a relative or nonrelative, a foster home, or a suitable licensed community care facility. As an alternative to these types of treatments, existing law authorizes the court to commit the minor to a juvenile home, ranch, camp, or forestry camp. The bill would clarify that these provisions shall not be construed to authorize the court to commit the minor to a juvenile home, ranch, camp, or forestry camp outside of the state. Existing law prohibits the court from ordering the placement of a minor who is adjudged a ward of the court in a private residential facility or program that provides 24-hour supervision, outside of the state, unless the court finds that specified conditions are met, including that in-state facilities or programs have been determined to be unavailable or inadequate to meet the needs of the minor. The bill would instead authorize the court to order the placement of a minor who is adjudged a ward of the court in a private residential facility or program that provides 24-hour supervision outside of the state if the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that, among other things, the case plan developed for the minor demonstrates that the out-of-state placement is the most appropriate and is in the best interests of the minor and that in-state facilities or programs have been considered and are unavailable or inadequate to meet the needs and best interests of the minor. The bill would make conforming changes. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Sections 727.1 and 727.4 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 1997, that would become operative only if AB 1997 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2017, and this bill is chaptered last.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
May 2016
Senate Passage
Aug 2016
Vetoed
Sep 2016
Introduced Feb 16, 2016
Vetoed Sep 30, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Aug 17, 2016 · Assembly May 5, 2016
How they voted
36–3
Passed
Total votes 39
Aug 17, 2016
D
Democratic26
100% Yea
R
Republican13
76% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
7
Committee
10
Amendments
1
Sep 30, 2016
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 23, 2016
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 6129.).
lower
Aug 17, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (36-3)
senate
Aug 17, 2016
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 19 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 14, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (June 14).
upper
May 31, 2016
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 19, 2016
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
May 12, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 5, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (77-0-1)
assembly
Apr 27, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 26).
lower
Mar 28, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Mar 16, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 14, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 17, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Sebastian Ridley-Thomas
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2005
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2005. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline