Peace officers: body-worn cameras: policies and procedures.
Summary
Existing law requires law enforcement agencies, departments, or entities to consider specified best practices regarding the downloading and storage of body-worn camera data when establishing policies and procedures for the implementation and operation of a body-worn camera system, such as designating the person responsible for downloading the recorded data from the body-worn camera, and establishing when data should be downloaded to ensure the data is entered into the system in a timely manner and the cameras are properly maintained and ready for the next use. This bill would require a law enforcement agency, department, or entity, if it employs peace officers and uses body-worn cameras for those officers, to develop a body-worn camera policy. The bill would require the policy to allow a peace officer to review his or her body-worn camera video and audio recordings before making a report, giving an internal affairs statement, or before any criminal or civil proceeding. The bill would also require the policy to prohibit a peace officer from making a video or audio recording in a health facility or medical office when a patient may be in view of the body-worn camera or when a health care practitioner is providing care to an individual. The bill would encourage the law enforcement agency, department, or entity to include specified considerations in the policy, including the time, place, circumstances, and duration in which the body-worn camera is operational. The bill would require the policy to be available to peace officers and to the public for viewing. The bill would prohibit a peace officer from using a personal device to make an unauthorized recording of the video or audio taken from a body-worn camera. The bill would also require a law enforcement agency to have an assigned independent investigator or a supervisor accompany a peace officer involved in an incident involving a serious use of force, as defined, when reviewing the peace officer's body-worn camera recording. The bill would provide that its provisions do not apply to a law enforcement agency, department, or entity that has developed a body-worn camera policy, as specified, before January 1, 2017. Because this bill would impose new duties on the conduct of local law enforcement, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Jun 2016
Assembly Passage
Jun 2016
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 12, 2016
Last action Jun 28, 2016
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 2, 2016
How they voted
69–7
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 78
Jun 2, 2016
D
Democratic52
84% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican25
96% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
4
Committee
10
Jun 9, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 2, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-7-2)
assembly
May 18, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 19. Noes 1.) (May 18).
lower
May 4, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 21, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 20, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 20). Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.
lower
Apr 18, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Apr 12, 2016
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 28, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 17, 2016
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and P. & C.P.
lower
Feb 16, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jim Cooper
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1940
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1940. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline