Public works: prevailing wage: apprentices.
Summary
Existing law requires that, except as specified, not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages, determined by the Director of Industrial Relations, be paid to workers employed on public works projects. Under existing law, an apprentice employed upon public works is required to be paid the prevailing rate of per diem wages for apprentices in the trade to which he or she is registered and to be employed only at the work of the craft or trade to which he or she is registered, as specified. This bill would require, when a contractor requests the dispatch of an apprentice to perform work on a public works project and requires compliance with certain preemployment activities as a condition of employment, as specified, that the apprentice be paid the prevailing rate for the time spent on any required preemployment activity, including travel time to and from the activity, if any, except as specified. Because this bill would expand the application of the prevailing wage requirements, the violation of which is a crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
May 2016
Senate Passage
Aug 2016
Signed into Law
Sep 2016
Introduced Feb 12, 2016
Signed Sep 28, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Aug 22, 2016 · Assembly May 19, 2016
How they voted
24–9
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 34
Aug 22, 2016
D
Democratic24
95% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
9
Committee
12
Amendments
2
Sep 28, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 25, 2016
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 64. Noes 12. Page 6297.).
lower
Aug 23, 2016
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 25 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 22, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-9-1)
senate
Jun 27, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 13, 2016
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 9, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 1.) (June 8).
upper
May 31, 2016
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
May 26, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
upper
May 19, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (57-13-5)
assembly
May 4, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 4.) (May 4).
lower
Apr 21, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 20). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 31, 2016
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 31, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Mar 16, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Mar 14, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Feb 16, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jim Cooper
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1926
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1926. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline