Mental health: sexually violent predators.
Summary
Existing law requires the Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to refer a person who is in custody under that department's jurisdiction, who is serving a determinate sentence or whose parole has been revoked, for evaluation by the State Department of State Hospitals if the secretary determines that the person may be a sexually violent predator. Existing law establishes a screening process for the department and the Board of Parole Hearings to determine whether a person has committed a sexually violent offense, and to determine if the person is likely to be a sexually violent predator prior to referral to the State Department of State Hospitals for a full evaluation. Existing law authorizes the board, upon a showing of good cause, as defined, to order that the person referred to the State Department of State Hospitals remain in custody for no more than 45 days beyond the person's scheduled release date for full evaluation. Existing law requires, if the State Department of State Hospitals determines that the person is a sexually violent predator, as defined, the Director of State Hospitals to forward a request to a specified county for a petition to be filed for the person to be committed to a facility for mental health treatment. This bill would require the Director of State Hospitals to forward the request no less than 20 calendar days prior to the scheduled release date of the person or, if the person is ordered by the board to remain in custody beyond the person's scheduled release date, no less than 20 calendar days prior to the end of that hold. The bill would modify the definition of "good cause" in the above provision. The bill would also make technical, nonsubstantive changes to these provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
Mar 2016
Senate Passage
Aug 2016
Signed into Law
Sep 2016
Introduced Feb 11, 2016
Signed Sep 30, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Aug 17, 2016 · Assembly Aug 23, 2016
How they voted
39–0
Passed
Total votes 39
Aug 17, 2016
D
Democratic26
100% Yea
R
Republican13
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Amendments
1
Sep 30, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 23, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (78-0)
assembly
Aug 23, 2016
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 6127.).
lower
Aug 17, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (39-0)
senate
Aug 17, 2016
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 19 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
May 10, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (May 10).
upper
Apr 7, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Mar 15, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (March 15).
lower
Feb 25, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 12, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 13.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Melissa A. Melendez
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1906
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1906. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline