Mental health: referral of conservatees.
Summary
Existing law provides a procedure for the appointment of a conservator for a person who is determined to be gravely disabled as a result of a mental disorder or an impairment by chronic alcoholism. Existing law authorizes certain persons to recommend conservatorship of an individual under his or her care to the officer providing conservatorship investigation in the county of the individual's residence, as specified. Existing law also provides for the establishment of a conservatorship for a person who is unable to properly provide for his or her personal needs or is substantially unable to manage his or her finances. This bill would authorize the court, if a conservatorship has already been established under the Probate Code, to refer the conservatee for an assessment by the local mental health system or plan to determine if the conservatee has a treatable mental illness, including whether the conservatee is gravely disabled as a result of a mental disorder or impairment by chronic alcoholism, and is unwilling to accept, or is incapable of accepting, treatment voluntarily. The bill would also require the court to appoint counsel to a conservatee if he or she cannot afford counsel. The bill would require the local mental health system or plan to file a copy of the assessment with the court that made the referral. By increasing county duties, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
Jun 2016
Senate Passage
Aug 2016
Signed into Law
Sep 2016
Introduced Feb 9, 2016
Signed Sep 29, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Aug 29, 2016 · Assembly Jun 1, 2016
How they voted
33–0
Passed
Total votes 33
Aug 29, 2016
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
7
Committee
13
Amendments
2
Sep 29, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 30, 2016
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 6483.).
lower
Aug 30, 2016
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 29, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0)
senate
Aug 11, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 11).
upper
Aug 8, 2016
Committee
Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Aug 2, 2016
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 1, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 28).
upper
Jun 15, 2016
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 9, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 1, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (71-0)
assembly
May 27, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 20. Noes 0.) (May 27).
lower
Apr 6, 2016
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 4, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 29, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (March 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 16, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (March 15). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 25, 2016
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and JUD.
lower
Feb 10, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 11.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
BM
Brian Maienschein
DDemocratic
Co
Bob Wieckowski
DDemocratic
Co
Cristina Garcia
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1836
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1836. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline